西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

《刑法》第48 条第1 款之规范解读
——以限制死刑适用为视角

张公典   

  1. 西南政法大学法学院,重庆渝北401120
  • 出版日期:2015-07-01 发布日期:2015-07-01
  • 作者简介:张公典(1990 ),男(汉族),河南周口人,硕士研究生,研究方向:中国刑法学。

An Interpretation of Limited Application of Death Penalty by Article 48
(1)of Criminal law——In the perspective of limit application of death penalty

ZHANG Gongdian   

  1. Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing,401120,China
  • Online:2015-07-01 Published:2015-07-01

摘要:

《刑法》第48 条第1 款规定了死刑适用的条件和死缓适用的情形,但“罪行极其严重”和“不是必须立即执
行”均缺乏明确的标准,不能指导司法实践对分则罪名的正确运用。“罪行极其严重”是犯罪的客观危害和主观恶性均
极其严重,内涵是“直接故意地实施了致命的犯罪并造成了致命结果的罪行”。对于罪行极其严重应当判处死刑的犯
罪分子原则上应当执行死缓而非死刑立即执行,只有犯罪人人身危险性极大的时候才执行死刑立即执行。对于人身
危险性极大的判断应要求具有反映人身危险的酌定从重情节和法定从重情节。

关键词: 死刑, 死缓, 罪行极其严重, 人身危险性, 主观恶性

Abstract:

Article 48 (1) of Criminal Law specifies the applicable conditions of death penalty and the reprieve. However,due to
lack of clear definition,“the most heinous crimes”and“the immediate execution…is not deemed necessary”are not adequate in
guiding the correct application of this specific provision in judicial practice. Therefore,the author holds that“the most heinous
crimes”are crimes of both extremely serious objective hazards and extremely serious subjective culpability,whose connotation
is“deadly crimes directly,intentionally committed which cause fatal results”. In principle,criminals who have committed
extremely heinous crimes should be sentenced to death with a suspension of execution rather than immediate execution. The
criminal shall be sentenced to immediate execution of death penalty only if his personal danger is great. The judgment of great
personal danger should be made on the basis of discretionary and statutory facts that support severe punishment.

Key words: death penalty, reprieve, the most heinous crimes, personal danger, subjective culpability